The ruling focused on the National Security Letter (NSL) provisions of the amended Patriot Act. The FBI and other agencies use NSLs to gather information about U.S. residents without a search warrant. The NSLs include gag orders prohibiting those who receive the letters from discussing them.I am not a friend of the Patriot Act and the, seemingly, unlimited amount of power it extends to those who have the privilege to use it. The problem with arguing against it is, "if you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?". Well, the problem is everyone has something to hide and it is our right to have a personal life, as long as we aren't breaking any laws. Liberty is an essential part of our nation, it isn't simply a privilege that can be turned on or off because of a whim. It should not be easy to get a warrant without probable cause, but the Patriot Act goes beyond that and makes a warrant unneeded at all.
It still irks me they named it the Patriot Act. Patriots fight for our nation, which is the people, not the government. They may as well have named it the Constitution, because we can't have the Constitution, which ensures our freedoms, standing alongside the Patriot Act, which denies our freedoms. It's good to see a judge using the Constitution as a reference and not trying to rewrite its interpretation so we can remain footstools for a heavy government.
In case you were wondering anything about me... I'm a Republican, Conservative, and in the military. That should at least give you a clue I'm not just some anti-Bush Liberal trying to make a name for myself.